1. Hong Kong
  2. Chi Ma Wan Beach
  3. Family Rental

Chi Ma Wan Beach Family Rentals & Large Homes

Find Family-Friendly Vacation Rentals Near Chi Ma Wan Beach

About Chi Ma Wan Beach Family Rental on Treehouse Rentals

Discover 36 in Chi Ma Wan Beach, perfect for reunions and group retreats.

TreeHouse offers a variety of spacious and charming treehouses designed to host large families or groups. Whether you’re planning a reunion with kids, grandparents, or even pets, our Chi Ma Wan Beach rentals offer a magical experience surrounded by nature.

Many treehouses feature modern amenities such as outdoor decks, fully equipped kitchens, Wi-Fi, and private play areas, ensuring comfort and convenience for your entire group. Explore 36 with ample space to make your family retreat unforgettable.

Book with TreeHouse today and reconnect with loved ones in a cozy, nature-inspired setting.

Show more
Show less

Frequently Asked Questions About Chi Ma Wan Beach Family Rentals

There are a lot of options in Chi Ma Wan Beach. If you plan on staying in the Chi Ma Wan Beach area, consider making a reservation for a few nights at one of these properties as these have been rated the top Family Rentals in Chi Ma Wan Beach:

The average price per night for a family holiday rental in Chi Ma Wan Beach is $181. Check the list of kid-friendly accommodations in Chi Ma Wan Beach.
There are 36 2-bedroom rental properties that are available in Chi Ma Wan Beach. You can book for your next trip with Treehouse Rentals.
Yes, here are some top-rated family vacation rentals in Chi Ma Wan Beach that have a private swimming pool:

Check all holiday rentals with a pool in Chi Ma Wan Beach on Treehouse Rentals.

Yes, We have 36 direct by owner rentals in Chi Ma Wan Beach.
Yes, Of course! There are many luxury rental properties in or near Chi Ma Wan Beach. Use our search filter to discover all of our luxury homes with your favorite amenities. Sorting by price is another way to find the luxury holiday rentals in Chi Ma Wan Beach, though more expensive is not always better.