1. Oman
  2. Wadi Al Arbeieen
  3. Family Rental

Wadi Al Arbeieen Family Rentals & Large Homes

Find Family-Friendly Vacation Rentals Near Wadi Al Arbeieen

About Wadi Al Arbeieen Family Rental on Treehouse Rentals

Discover 126 in Wadi Al Arbeieen, perfect for reunions and group retreats.

TreeHouse offers a variety of spacious and charming treehouses designed to host large families or groups. Whether you’re planning a reunion with kids, grandparents, or even pets, our Wadi Al Arbeieen rentals offer a magical experience surrounded by nature.

Many treehouses feature modern amenities such as outdoor decks, fully equipped kitchens, Wi-Fi, and private play areas, ensuring comfort and convenience for your entire group. Explore 126 with ample space to make your family retreat unforgettable.

Book with TreeHouse today and reconnect with loved ones in a cozy, nature-inspired setting.

Show more
Show less

Frequently Asked Questions About Wadi Al Arbeieen Family Rentals

There are a lot of options in Wadi Al Arbeieen. If you plan on staying in the Wadi Al Arbeieen area, consider making a reservation for a few nights at one of these properties as these have been rated the top Family Rentals in Wadi Al Arbeieen:

The average price per night for a family holiday rental in Wadi Al Arbeieen is $191. Check the list of kid-friendly accommodations in Wadi Al Arbeieen.
There are 126 2-bedroom rental properties that are available in Wadi Al Arbeieen. You can book for your next trip with Treehouse Rentals.
Yes, here are some top-rated family vacation rentals in Wadi Al Arbeieen that have a private swimming pool:

Check all holiday rentals with a pool in Wadi Al Arbeieen on Treehouse Rentals.

Yes, We have 126 direct by owner rentals in Wadi Al Arbeieen.
Yes, Of course! There are many luxury rental properties in or near Wadi Al Arbeieen. Use our search filter to discover all of our luxury homes with your favorite amenities. Sorting by price is another way to find the luxury holiday rentals in Wadi Al Arbeieen, though more expensive is not always better.